Department of Industrial Engineering and Management

Competence in exploiting digital networks is lacking –› Innovation activities should be transferred to digital networks

Companies in the manufacturing industry do not yet exploit the benefits of digital networks in their innovation activities. Digital technology and platform-based operating models radically change the location, organisation, participation, and practices of innovation activities (Parker, & Van Alstyne, 2018). Innovation increasingly takes place in networks forming around platforms and digital architecture structures (‘crowdsourcing’). In particular, recent developments include the larger role of hybrid platforms (Cusumano et al., 2019) and new digital tools for innovation (e.g. AI platforms) (Mucha & Seppälä, 2020). In digital networks, solutions can be sought quickly and cost-effectively around the world.

Challenge: Competence in exploiting digital networks is lacking

The manufacturing industry is unable to benefit from digital networks because (1) openness is considered a risk, 2) open interfaces that enable innovation are not created, and (3) companies lack the ability to develop service business.

(1) Openness is considered a risk: Innovation still largely takes place within companies, and transitioning to networks is a major leap in terms of organisation culture, operating models, and ‘openness principles’. The principle of openness is by no means easy to implement, as the company in question would have to partially renounce control of its core functions. In the manufacturing industry, highly critical equipment and machinery which involve major investments could be at stake.

(2) No open interfaces allowing for innovation are created: Large corporations with the capacity to create key platforms use their position to protect their own interfaces and standards. Official standardisation is also lagging behind. In the United States, ad hoc standards which subsequently become official are created in companies engaging in rapid experiments. However, these standards are necessary for creating functional and open interfaces in the platform economy.

(3) Companies lack the ability to develop service business: The sale of services, such as Software As A Service solutions subject to a monthly charge, differs significantly from the traditional sale of machinery. Individual machines and devices are purchased as one-off investments, and maintenance is often the only additional outsourced service. The sale of more advanced services and software requires more specific insight into customers’ value creation, such as processes and offer.

Recommendation: Innovation activities should be transferred to digital networks 

Supporting the creation of digital innovation networks and their development

  • The creation of open interfaces should be supported through innovation policy. Attention should also be paid to the development of innovation abilities in networks where shared co-development levels out the risks and costs.
  • When innovation takes place on a platform, any support provided should take the special features of the platform economy into account. While current innovation support often does not accept commercialisation, on platforms a marketplace must be created from the start before innovation is possible.

Developing technologies and practices that inspire trust

  • The development of technologies that will enable the creation of trustworthy, global platforms should be supported. A platform requiring reliable TUPAS identification will remain local, whereas email-based identification allows the marketplace to become global but does not inspire trust as a form of authentication.
  • New operating models that comply with open practices should be supported, financial incentives for them should be secured, and the principles of openness should be included in the eligibility conditions for innovation support. New co-creation platforms can even level out risks and contribute to the development of radical innovations.

Other challenges and recommendations

Colourful blocks. Photo by Mikko Raskinen.jpg

Only few platforms are created –› Thresholds for participating in the early stages of development should be lowered

In the early stages of digital platform development, three factors make companies’ thresholds for participating higher: a lack of trust, a lack of competence related to the platform economy, and closed ICT systems.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management
3D printed

Insufficient data sharing –› Data sharing practices and obligations should be developed

The current data market does not encourage data sharing. There are four reasons for this situation: determining the value of data is difficult, cooperation practices are restrictive, legislation is incomplete or restrictive, and companies have no expertise in data-based business.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management
Kuutiot

Lack of shared digital goods –› Open digital goods should be created

The main reasons for the small number of shared digital goods in the manufacturing industry are the lack of competence in platform and data business, and rigid organisation structures.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management

Back to the Policy Brief main page

Image of a crane hook.

How will innovations fare in the platform economy? Four challenges and solutions for the manufacturing industry

This policy brief focuses on the innovation challenges of the platform economy in the manufacturing industry. We discuss four innovation challenges facing the manufacturing industry and the key reasons for them. We present recommendations related to innovation policy that can accelerate the development and growth of the platform economy in the manufacturing industry.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management
  • Published:
  • Updated: